AlphaValue Corporate Services
This research has been commissioned and paid for by the company and does therefore not constitute an inducement caught by the prohibition under MiFID II

Drone Volt

CR
Bloomberg   ALDRV FP
Aerosp. & Defence Equipt.  /  France  Web Site   |   Investors Relation
Banking on services and European-made drones

Sustainability score
Company (Sector)
4.9 (5.1)

Sustainability is made of analytical items contributing to the E, the S and the G, that can be highlighted as sustainability precursors and can be combined in an intellectually acceptable way. This is the only scale made available

  Score Weight  
Governance   
Independent directors rate 8/10 25%More ...
Board geographic diversity 4/10 20%
Chairman vs. Executive split 5%
Environment   
CO² Emission 2/1025%More ...
Water withdrawal 2/1010%
Social   
Wage dispersion trend5/105%More ...
Job satisfaction3/105%
Internal communication10/105%


Sustainability score 4.9/10 100%  
Sustainability matters

Drone Volt has a sustainable model. As regulations on drones ease up and their technologies mature, we believe drones could replace current vehicles in some niche applications due to speed and energy efficiency. For inspection, it is safer and less energy intensive than a helicopter. For transporting vital medical material (or organs) from one neighbor hospital to another, drones are faster than cars which could be stuck in traffic jams. If their solutions are adopted by the market, the carbon impact would be positive.


Governance score
Company (Sector) Independent board Help
5.4 (7.5) Yes
ParametersCompanySectorScoreWeight
Number of board members513 10/10 5.0%
Board feminization (%)2040 4/10 5.0%
Board domestic density (%)8067 4/10 10.0%
Average age of board's members5961 6/10 5.0%
Type of company : Small cap, controlled 4/10 10.0%
Independent directors rate8052 8/10 20.0%
One share, one vote 10.0%
Chairman vs. Executive split 0.0%
Chairman not ex executive 5.0%
Full disclosure on mgt pay 5.0%
Disclosure of performance anchor for bonus trigger 5.0%
Compensation committee reporting to board of directors 5.0%
Straightforward, clean by-laws 15.0%
Governance score 5.4/10 100.0%
     
Governance matters

Mr Dimitri Batsis is the founder of the company and the main shareholder. He has experience in pioneer markets as the former CEO and founder in 1987 of Zeni Coporation. The company had a successful IPO in April 2000 and was acquired in 2007 by Keyrus.

He ran the company until May 2017, when he resigned and left his successor, Mr Olivier Gualdoni, in charge. Mr Gualdoni joined the company in 2015 and helped Mr Batsis to structure the company. Prior to joining Drone Volt, he served as CEO of Cybergun SA.

On 18 October 2020, Drone Volt changed its governance due to the death of the CEO Mr Olivier Gualdoni on 17 October. The Board has thus co-opted Dimitri Batsis, founder of Drone Volt and historical shareholder since 2012, as a director and appointed him Chairman of the Board of Directors, a position it had entrusted to Olivier Gualdoni a few years earlier. The Board unanimously decided to separate the functions of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and appointed Marc Courcelle, until then Drone Volt’s Director of Production, as Chief Executive Officer. Stefano Valentini took over the position of Chairman in 2021 after this transition period, having spent five years at Drone Volt before in various senior positions.

Stefano VALENTINI M President/Ch... 2029 2021 30.0 (2023)
Fabrice LEGRAND M Member 2028 1964 2016 30.0 (2023) ND (2023)
Laurent LELEUP M Member 2029 1966 2017 30.0 (2023) ND (2023)
Céline MARSAC F Member 2025 2021 30.0 (2023)
Stanislas VEILLET M Member 2027 1965 2017 30.0 (2023) ND (2023)
Dimitri BATSIS M President/Ch... 2023 2020 2020 ND (2021) ND (2021)
Olivier GUALDONI M President/Ch... 2023 1966 2017 2020 92.6 (2020)
Jean-Claude BOURDON M Member 1952 2019 2022 ND (2021) ND (2021)
Changes to Board of directors : 20/09/2024
Name (5) Indep.
(4/5)
Challenged
(conflicted interests, distant or current)
Die hard
(7 years or more)
Improbable
(too young, disconnected profile)
Overloaded
(too many boards, too old)
Specific agenda
(gov. or staff rep)
Tied
(family, business relations, executive)
Unknown
(lack of history, short CV)
Stefano VALENTINI
Fabrice LEGRAND
Laurent LELEUP
Céline MARSAC
Stanislas VEILLET
Marc COURCELLE M CEO 2020 258 (2023)
Sylvain NAVARRO M CFO 1977 2018 ND (2023)
Changes to Management : 15/07/2024
Existing committees
  • Audit / Governance Committee
  • Compensation committee
  • Financial Statements Committee
  • Litigation Committee
  • Nomination Committee
  • Safety committee
  • SRI / Environment

Environmental score
Company (Sector)
2.2 (3.9)
Data sets evaluated as trends on rolling calendar, made sector relative
ParametersScoreSectorWeight
CO² Emission2/103/10 30%
Water withdrawal2/104/10 30%
Energy2/104/10 25%
Waste3/104/10 15%
Environmental score2.2  100%
Environment matters

Due to its small size, Drone Volt is not required to publish its Environmental metrics. Therefore, its poor environmental grade is irrelevant, as is any comparison with other peers of its Environmental score.

We believe that Drone Volt’s business model could remove many emissions. Its drone solutions are the alternative to often energy intensive methods. For example, its LineDrone would be used for high-voltage cable inspection where a helicopter would have been used previously. The drone is then capable of rolling on the lines (as it has the technological capacity to resist such high voltages), which is far less energy intensive then a helicopter flying still above the power line. In addition, as it can withstand high voltages, the power line does not need to be cut for it to operate (conversely to currently used methods). This improves the electrical grid efficiency.

Drone Volt is also investing heavily in hydrogen technology. It has already managed to produce a drone charging station through its partnership with Roth2 which would enable its largest drone, the Hercules 20, to fly longer with zero emissions. The charging station it has developed also enables the charging of other products, such as bikes.

Despite the lack of data on Drone Volt’s environmental metrics, we believe that its business model will have a positive impact on the global emissions of the niche industry it is addressing.

Environmental metrics


Energy (GJ) per €m in capital
employed

CO² tons per €m in capital
employed

Cubic meter water
withdrawal per €m in capital
employed

Tons waste generated per €m in
capital employed
Drone Volt Aerospace-Defence
Sector figures
Company CountryEnvironment
score
Energy
(total,
in GJ)
CO2
Emissions
(in tons)
CO2
Compensation
(in tons)
Water
Withdrawal
(in m3)
Waste
(total,
(in tons)
        
Airbus Group 6/1013,125,600645,000 3,535,86777,208
BAE Systems 6/102,726,586350,817 5,061,34667,790
Drone VoltCR 2/10     
Leonardo 5/105,311,000423,587 4,929,00033,065
MTU Aero Engines 4/101,166,22473,970 8,538,5007,950
Rheinmetall 3/103,562,621290,171 4,112,26960,417
Rolls-Royce 5/103,412,638328,277544,1003,560,00058,800
Safran 5/104,256,064437,053 3,236,41377,173
Thales 7/103,131,47897,000 1,510,00019,355

Social score
Company (Sector)
5.3 (6.5)
Social matters

It is difficult to judge on the Social aspect of Drone Volt given the limited data available. Due to the lack of cash, average salaries are logically below those of the major European Aerospace & Defense stocks. From 2018 until 2021, the workforce has steadily decreased due to the restructuring of the group. Since 2022, the trend has started to reverse, notably thanks to the new drone as a service offer “Drone Volt Expert”, based on the recruitment of 16 people from ex-AirMarine. We believe that when the momentum of the LineDrone and other innovative solutions takes off, it will restore a healthy cash balance which would enable Drone Volt to recruit more employees and retain them with higher salaries.

Concerning the impact of its products on society, using its drone solutions has a key advantage: safety. Its built-in drone solutions are often the alternative to helicopters, which are flown by people. Some surveillance missions in unsafe environments can be dangerous (flying to an offshore wind turbine) and have caused deaths in the past. Flying an unmanned drone would fully remove safety issues.

Quantitative metrics (67%)
Set of staff related numerical metrics available in AlphaValue proprietary modelling aimed at ranking on social/HR matters
ParametersScoreWeight
Staffing Trend9/10 15%
Average wage trend7/10 30%
Share of added value taken up by staff cost1/10 20%
Share of added value taken up by taxes1/10 15%
Wage dispersion trend5/10 20%
Pension bonus (0 or 1)0
Quantitative score4.8/10 100%
Qualitative metrics (33%)
Set of listed qualitative criterias and for the analyst to tick

ParametersScoreWeight
Accidents at work4/10 25%
Human resources development7/10 35%
Pay7/10 20%
Job satisfaction3/10 10%
Internal communication10/10 10%
  
Qualitative score6.2/10 100%


Sector figures
CompanyCountrySocial Score Quantitative scoreQualitative scoreStaffing
      
Rheinmetall 7.37.76.527,393
Thales 7.26.97.881,306
Safran 7.17.17.293,824
Airbus Group 7.06.28.6153,809
BAE Systems 6.77.06.1100,798
MTU Aero Engines 6.15.67.112,778
Rolls-Royce 5.96.54.739,314
Leonardo 4.85.34.055,709

Sustainability / ESG by AlphaValue:

Doubt driven, focused on dynamics


AlphaValue was set up in 2009 as an ESG native firm: since inception, no research could be published without filling up the ESG relevant items. ESG has always been there as a natural building block of the research effort.

Without much pretence, AlphaValue has accumulated 11 years of proprietary, practical data in a consistent way that has been made to “talk” with financial data. The efforts have been aimed at solving the main conundrum of ESG analytics: avoiding useless and noisy data. AlphaValue ESG data is intimately connected to the fundamental research work and its continuous updating process. In other words, AlphaValue ESG data can be made to resonate at will in terms of financial implications for those investors with the willingness to do so.

Over the last 3 years, this data, or rather the dynamic of this data, has been put at work so that it impacts directly and consistently on valuations across AlphaValue’s 450 + stocks universe. This is considerable progress vs. the dominant “consumption” of ESG raw data: ESG-type conclusions are sitting next to valuation fundamentals but hardly any investor is in a position to bridge effectively the two in a consistent and repeatable way. It takes more than a spreadsheet to get stable and auditable results that work 100% of the time.

AlphaValue reckons that it currently is the only equity research provider in Europe to have reached this stage: a perfectly smooth on-boarding of ESG data, on a continuing basis, impacting valuation fundamentals day and night.

This is available on every stock, every sector, every stock selection, every day.


Heretical ESG opinions?


ESG is a contradiction in terms. Without a good Governance, the Social and Environment items will never show progress. Social is for stakeholders and thus unlikely to please shareholders. The long-term view that good pay/working conditions are ultimately good for shareholders is, like any promise, better left to those who want to believe in it. It does not work for normal investment horizons

Environmental gains will not happen without good Governance but this is not enough as environmental progress will not happen without coercion from governments/supra-governments. There is no reason why a corporate will spend more for a possible collective gain tomorrow when it can have better returns now for its shareholders.

The environment is a cost of massive complexity and a universal one as data improves and allows for intricate tracking of what corporates are up to. There is no practical way a corporate can be valued through a web of changing definitions of environmental data. AlphaValue holds the view that all corporates are made to pay through lower GDP growth expectations resulting from friction costs. The only dimension that really matters from an investment perspective is whether a given corporate makes an extra effort vs. peers. A good ‘E’ rating shall not be driven by absolute levels but by the dynamic of emission controls relative to peers. Dumping cement stocks because they spit out carbon is a narrow view of what ESG implies.

Sustainability scores only

AlphaValue always refused to supply a pecking order of its coverage along some improbable ESG scale. It just does not make sense to mix opposing signals in a single ranking.

Sustainability is a different proposition where analytical items contributing to the E, the S and the G can be highlighted as sustainability precursors and combined in an intellectually acceptable way. This is the only scale made available by AlphaValue.

Sustainability impacts target prices

From 1-12-2020, AlphaValue substituted sustainability metrics for its Governance and Social ones when it comes to impacting valuations;

Indeed since 2019, all DCF (or DCF equivalents for Financials) have been impacted by Governance and Social metrics to connect directly ESG-type findings into share price targets and bring consistency across the board. The impact is driven by adjusting the small ‘g’ conventionally used to assess the growth to infinity. This is being tweaked to recognise, say, that good governance ultimately pays off.

The same procedure is now stemming from Sustainability metrics instead.

For the record, this has been made possible as AlphaValue has finalised its proprietary E scoring, now extended to 4 items (GHG, Waste, Water, Energy) on which a degree of data stability seems to emerge.